Skip to main content

Table 5 Group comparisons of cognitive performances using repeated measures ANOVA in sample I

From: Cognitive functioning in opioid-dependent patients treated with buprenorphine, methadone, and other psychoactive medications: stability and correlates

TAP Tonic Alertness/simple reaction time (ms)     
T1 232 ± 25 261 ± 21 238 ± 22 Group, p = 0.002
T2 236 ± 18 263 ± 21 233 ± 21a Time, ns
T3 242 ± 25 267 ± 36 241 ± 25 Group × Time, ns
TAP Phasic Alertness/ reaction time with warning signal (ms)     
T1 227 ± 24 244 ± 20 226 ± 21 Group, p = 0.005
T2 229 ± 21 255 ± 28 224 ± 21 a Time, ns
T3 229 ± 19 254 ± 45 225 ± 22 Group × Time, ns
TAP Go-NoGo reaction time (ms)     
T1 490 ± 50 548 ± 74 460 ± 41 Group, p = 0.001
T2 480 ± 42 548 ± 104 443 ± 72 a Group, p = 0.002
T3 493 ± 43 529 ± 63 462 ± 47 Age, p = 0.022
     Time, ns
     Group × Time, ns
TAP Go-NoGo errors     
T1 1.1 ± 1.3 0.7 ± 0.6 0.5 ± 0.5 ns
T2 0.5 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.8 a ns
T3 0.6 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 1.0 0.2 ± 0.4 ns
The Letter-Number Sequencing     
T1 8.4 ± 2.2 9.3 ± 2.4 11.8 ± 3.4 Group, p = 0.009
T2 8.8 ± 2.2 8.5 ± 2.3 11.6 ± 3.0 Time, ns
T3 10.6 ± 2.2 8.8 ± 2.4 11.2 ± 3.2 Group × Time, p = 0.007
The PASAT     
T1 32.4 ± 10.5 31.0 ± 8.5 46.3 ± 9.7 Group, p = 0.001
T2 35.0 ± 6.8 33.4 ± 10.1 45.8 ± 9.0 a Time, p = 0.013
T3 35.8 ± 10.0 34.9 ± 11.0 49.8 ± 8.4 Group × Time, ns
Logical memory, immediate     
T1 12.8 ± 2.6 14.9 ± 4.5 15.9 ± 3.3 Group, p = 0.016
T2 13.8 ± 3.1 14.8 ± 3.7 16.3 ± 3.2 Time, ns
T3 15.5 ± 4.1 14.3 ± 4.3 17.9 ± 2.9 Group × Time, ns
Logical memory, delayed     
T1 11.8 ± 3.0 13.1 ± 4.0 13.9 ± 4.0 Group, p = 0.013
T2 12.0 ± 4.0 13.7 ± 4.0 15.6 ± 3.1 Time, ns
T3 12.4 ± 4.1 11.8 ± 4.7 15.9 ± 3.6 Group × Time, ns
  1. Bold indicates statistically significant effects.
  2. a One missing value was replaced by the carry-over value from the preceding testing point.