Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
11 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Manu Shankar Hari |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
5 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Talbert |
11 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda Bjorkhem-Bergman |
20 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Fraunberger |
11 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Manu Shankar Hari |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Linda Bjorkhem-Bergman |
21 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Talbert |
29 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Manu Shankar Hari |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Manu Shankar Hari |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
29 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Manu Shankar Hari |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
29 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
11 Jun 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6904-12-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.