Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sonal Singh |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
15 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
17 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sonal Singh |
2 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
3 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
3 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
3 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
3 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
3 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
3 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
17 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
17 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
24 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6904-11-5 |
You can find further information about peer review here.